Apple is undergoing a profound transformation in its artificial intelligence strategy. On one hand, the upcoming iOS 27 is set to become an open platform allowing users to choose which third-party AI models to use for various tasks, a true revolution in how people interact with the Apple ecosystem. On the other hand, the company has just reached a $250 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit related to the delays of Siri features powered by Apple Intelligence, casting a shadow over the promises made during the iPhone 16 launch.
According to sources close to the company, iOS 27 will introduce a modular artificial intelligence system. Users will be able to select models such as Claude by Anthropic and Gemini by Google for specific tasks, from text generation to image analysis to real-time translation. This strategy, described by analysts as a choose-your-own-adventure approach, represents a clear break from the past when Apple tried to keep everything under its own control. The move is reminiscent of the browser choice screen in Safari but taken to the next level. Users can set a default AI model for each category of activity, creating a personalized and potentially more powerful experience. This announcement aligns with strategies from competitors like OpenAI, which with GPT-5.5 Instant recently improved personalization and reduced hallucinations, as discussed in our article on OpenAI Releases GPT-5.5 Instant.
However, the path to this openness has not been without obstacles. The class action lawsuit, filed in California, accused Apple of false advertising for promoting Siri features based on Apple Intelligence during the iPhone 16 launch, only to delay them repeatedly. The ads, which ran for months, showed a Siri capable of understanding the user's personal context, managing complex chains of commands, and acting proactively. But in March 2025, Apple announced an indefinite postponement. The class action argued that consumers bought the devices believing they would get features that did not exist or were materially misrepresented. The court ruled in favor of the class, leading to a preliminary settlement last December, the terms of which have now been made public.
Settlement Details and Consumer Impact
The $250 million settlement provides that Apple will pay up to $95 per device to class members who submit claims, with a minimum guaranteed $25 per eligible device. Covered devices include iPhone 16, iPhone 16e, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max purchased between June 10, 2024 and March 29, 2025. Apple, while denying any wrongdoing, chose to settle to focus on product development. In an official statement, the company reminded that it has introduced dozens of Apple Intelligence features since 2024, including Visual Intelligence, Live Translation, Writing Tools, Genmoji, and Clean Up. The case raises important questions about the responsibility of tech companies when marketing AI features, a hot topic in an industry where promises often outpace reality. For a similar case, read the article on Pennsylvania Sues Character.AI After Chatbot Allegedly Posed as a Doctor.
The timing is particularly interesting. While Apple pays for Siri delays, with iOS 27 it opens the door to competing models. This signals that the company recognizes its internal AI development limitations and aims for a hybrid strategy where the closed ecosystem opens up to external partners. Choosing to integrate Claude and Gemini is not trivial. It means Apple is willing to share some control over the user experience in order to offer cutting-edge features. This could lead to a new era of interoperability between AI assistants, where users are free to choose the best model for each task, much like we choose browsers or email apps today. However, privacy implications remain a crucial variable, as third-party models may access sensitive data. Apple has stated it will implement robust protections, but experts remain cautious.
In conclusion, Apple stands at a crossroads. The $250 million fine represents both a reputational and financial cost, but the company seems determined to turn the page by focusing on iOS 27 and its new open AI architecture. For consumers, this means more choice and potentially a better experience, but also the need to navigate between different AI providers. The future of phone interactions may no longer be dictated solely by Cupertino but could become a mosaic of different artificial intelligences. A revolution that, if managed well, could redefine the very concept of a digital assistant. For more information on Apple Intelligence, see the Wikipedia page: Apple Intelligence on Wikipedia.
Sponsored Protocol