Meta is experiencing a turbulent spring. While Threads finally launches web messaging, aligning with competitors like X and Bluesky, the company simultaneously faces an investigation by Irish regulators over alleged dark patterns and a class action lawsuit from book publishers for copyright infringement related to its Llama AI model.
Threads brings messaging to the web
Until recently, Threads allowed direct messages only on its mobile app. Now, Meta's social networking platform has extended the feature to the web version, closing a gap that differentiated it from rivals like X and Bluesky. This update comes at a time when Meta is trying to consolidate Threads as a stable microblogging alternative. However, this functional progress is overshadowed by two serious legal and regulatory issues threatening the company's reputation. For a deeper look into Meta's recent privacy decisions, see the analysis on Instagram removing end-to-end encryption.
Irish investigation into dark patterns
The Irish Data Protection Commission has opened an investigation to determine whether Meta is using dark patterns to steer users toward algorithmic feeds, away from non-algorithmic ones. European law requires large platforms to offer alternative feeds not based on personalized recommendations. Regulators suspect Meta may have designed interfaces that make it harder for users to choose a chronological or neutral feed, potentially violating the Digital Services Act. This investigation adds to the already tense climate for Menlo Park, which faces increasing scrutiny over its UI design practices. In this context, it is useful to compare this scenario with Apple's opening to third-party AI models in iOS 27, detailed in this related article.
Publishers lawsuit against Meta and Zuckerberg over Llama copyright
In parallel, a class action brought by major book publishers accuses Meta and Mark Zuckerberg of copyright infringement. According to the complaint, the company used protected works without authorization to train its Llama AI language model. The publishers claim that Meta's massive data scraping incorporated entire volumes, violating intellectual property rights. This lawsuit is part of the broader legal debate over the use of copyrighted content for training AI models. For context on Meta's past controversies, refer to the Wikipedia page on Meta Platforms.
The intersection of these three stories paints a complex picture for Meta in 2026. On one hand, product innovation continues with web messaging on Threads, a necessary step to compete. On the other, European authorities tighten the noose on deceptive interfaces, while US courts prepare to judge the legality of training AI models on editorial data. The social media giant's future will depend on its ability to navigate these turbulent waters without sacrificing either innovation or regulatory compliance.
Sponsored Protocol