The night sky could be permanently altered by private space projects, and the international community has little power to stop them. On July 10, 2026, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved an application by California-based Reflect Orbital to launch an 18-meter space mirror to test reflecting sunlight onto solar farms after sunset. Despite hundreds of objections from astronomers and environmentalists, the FCC greenlit the test, raising fears that it may soon approve the full constellation of 50,000 mirrors. Experts in space law say that under the United Nations Outer Space Treaty of 1967, the nation where a satellite is registered has sole authority to approve projects. This gives the FCC unilateral power to authorize mega-constellations that will change the view of the night sky worldwide.
Sponsored Protocol
International regulatory gaps enable private sector dominance
Ruskin Hartley, CEO of DarkSky International, told Space.com that the Outer Space Treaty only covers physical damage, not light pollution or optical interference. "If a satellite reflects sunlight down and damages someone's observatory, that probably doesn't count as damage under the treaty," he said. The technology is outpacing the regulatory environment, and companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Starcloud are also awaiting FCC decisions on their own massive fleets of satellites and orbiting data centers.
Slovakia and IAU push for a ban on space mirrors but face slow progress
In June, Slovakia, in cooperation with the International Astronomical Union, submitted a paper to the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) calling for a general prohibition on space mirrors or stronger oversight. "These agreements can be slow to achieve," admitted astronomer Aaron Boley of the University of British Columbia. The UN requires unanimous consensus, making swift action nearly impossible.
Sponsored Protocol
Satellite industry exempt from environmental review in the U.S.
The satellite industry enjoys an exemption from the National Environmental Policy Act, a regulatory gap dating back to the 1980s when launches were rare. Hartley called it a "regulatory failure." DarkSky previously sued the FCC over SpaceX's license but lost. If the FCC approves Reflect Orbital's full constellation or SpaceX's million orbiting data centers, another lawsuit may follow. Meanwhile, the recent SpaceX Starship Flight 13 demonstrates how rapidly private companies are advancing, leaving regulations behind.
Sponsored Protocol
Global consequences of unilateral space decisions
Robin J. Frank, former NASA legal counsel, noted that the FCC has previously approved direct-to-cell communications using radio spectrum not authorized by the International Telecommunication Union. Similarly, space mirrors could be forced through without international consensus. Individual nations might fine companies that beam light onto their territory, but accidental reflections from satellites would still cause global light pollution. For more on the legal framework, see the Outer Space Treaty on Wikipedia.
